APREMILAST TAB,ORAL
Clinical Criteria Summary
Document 424: Apremilast in Behcets Disease Criteria Mar 2023
Exclusion Criteria
- Concomitant therapy with strong CYP450 enzyme inducers (e.g., rifampin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin), which may cause loss of efficacy of apremilast
- Untreated or unstable depression or suicidality, unless a mental health consultant concurs with apremilast treatment
Inclusion Criteria
- Prescribed and monitored by a VA/VA Community Care rheumatologist or locally-designated expert
- Adult (18 years of age or older) with recurrence of 2 or more oral ulcers associated with Behçet's disease
Additional Inclusion Criteria for Patients Who Can Become Pregnant
- Counseling provided on potential risks vs benefits of treatment and the use of effective contraception during therapy
Document 17: Apremilast in Psoriasis Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
- Concomitant therapy with strong CYP450 enzyme inducers (e.g., rifampin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin), which may cause loss of efficacy of apremilast.
- Untreated or unstable depression or suicidality unless mental health consultation concurs with apremilast treatment.
Inclusion Criteria
- Prescribed and monitored by a VA/VA Community Care dermatologist or locally-designated expert.
- Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis.
- Phototherapy is medically inadvisable, not available, not feasible, not tolerated, or not adequate.
Additional Inclusion Criteria (One must be met)
- Documented mild to moderate disease AND tried and had an inadequate response to ≥ 3 classes of topical therapies (≥ 1 month per class) or intolerance unless medically inadvisable (prior trials not required).
- Documented moderate to severe disease, impaired function or quality of life, or involvement of special areas AND 1 conventional immunomodulator and 2 classes of targeted immunomodulators are medically inadvisable (prior trials not required).
Additional Inclusion Criteria for Patients Who Can Become Pregnant
- Counseling provided on potential risks vs benefits of treatment and the use of effective contraception during therapy.
Document 425: Apremilast in Psoriatic Arthritis Criteria Mar 2023
Exclusion Criteria
- Concomitant therapy with strong CYP450 enzyme inducers (e.g., rifampin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin), which may cause loss of efficacy
- Untreated or unstable depression or suicidality, unless a mental health consultant concurs with apremilast treatment
Inclusion Criteria
- Prescribed and monitored by a VA/VA Community Care rheumatologist, dermatologist, or locally designated expert
- Nonsevere or predominantly oligoarticular peripheral inflammatory disease and a definite or provisional diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis (note: ineffective for joint erosions and axial disease)
- Conventional synthetic immunomodulator (methotrexate, leflunomide or sulfasalazine) is medically inadvisable, not tolerated, or not adequate after 12 weeks
- Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFI) therapy is medically inadvisable
Additional Inclusion Criteria for Patients Who Can Become Pregnant
- Counseling provided on potential risks vs benefits of treatment and the use of effective contraception during therapy
Clinical Adjudication & Supplemental Considerations
- Conventional synthetic immunomodulator: Adequate trial requires NO or partial treatment benefit after 12 weeks at doses of 15–25 mg/wk (or lower if limited by toxicity); for inadequate responders, consider switching to subcutaneous methotrexate. For other immunomodulators, require NO or partial treatment benefit after 12 weeks at recommended doses (or lower if limited by toxicity).
- TNFI therapy: Prior trial is not required but should be recommended if medically advisable. For TNFI inadequate/nonresponders, consider switching to a second TNFI, another biologic, or tofacitinib rather than apremilast monotherapy.
- TNFI may be medically inadvisable due to heart failure, demyelinating disease, multiple sclerosis in first-degree relative, lupus, recurrent infections, serious infections, etc.
- Aversity to injections or barriers to in-clinic administration (e.g., travel) should be adjudicated case by case as a reason why a TNFI is medically inadvisable.